Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
  1. May 23, 2019
  2. May 22, 2019
  3. May 21, 2019
  4. May 16, 2019
  5. May 15, 2019
  6. May 01, 2019
  7. Apr 29, 2019
  8. Apr 07, 2019
  9. Apr 05, 2019
  10. Mar 26, 2019
  11. Mar 25, 2019
  12. Mar 03, 2019
  13. Feb 23, 2019
  14. Feb 22, 2019
    • gnzlbg's avatar
      Clean libc-test for apple targets · f5cbdbc2
      gnzlbg authored
      This cleans up the build.rs of `libc-test` for apple targets.
      
      I wanted to update the docker containers of some targets so that we can start
      testing newer currently-skipped APIs properly, but it is impossible to figure
      out which headers and APIs are skipped for each target.
      
      This PR separates the testing of apple targets into its own self-contained
      function. This allows seeing exactly which headers are included, and which items
      are skipped. A lot of work will be required to separate the testing of all major
      platforms and make the script reasonable.
      
      During the clean up, I discovered that, at least for apple targets, deprecated
      but not removed APIs are not tested. I re-enabled testing for those, and fixed
      `daemon`, which was not properly linking its symbol. I also added the
      `#[deprecated]` attribute to the `#[deprecated]` APIs of the apple targets. The
      attribute is available since Rust 1.9.0 and the min. Rust version we support is
      Rust 1.13.0.
      
      Many other APIs are also currently not tested "because they are weird" which I
      interpret as "the test failed for an unknown reason", as a consequence:
      
      * the signatures of execv, execve, and execvp are incorrect (see
        https://github.com/rust-lang/libc/issues/1272)
      
      * the `sig_t` type is called `sighandler_t` in libc for some reason:
        https://github.com/rust-lang/libc/issues/1273
      
      This probably explains why some other things, like the
      `sa_handler`/`sa_sigaction` fields of `sigaction` were skipped. The field is
      actually a union, which can be either a `sig_t` for the `sa_handler` field, or
      some other type for the `sa_sigaction` field, but because the distinction was
      not made, the field was not checked.
      
      The latest ctest version can check volatile pointers, so a couple of skipped
      tests are now tested using this feature.
      f5cbdbc2
    • Bryant Mairs's avatar
      Unify PartialEq and Hash implementation · a12c3833
      Bryant Mairs authored
      a12c3833
  15. Feb 19, 2019
Loading